Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Does not state whether he thinks the paper should be published. Provides observations and suggests modifications which could be made, but adds that his suggestions may not be entirely based on resounding knowledge. He has no clear comprehension of Joule's experimental arrangements.

Subject: Physics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1856]

Reference number
RR/3/155
Earliest possible date
25 July 1855
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Tyndall

View page for John Tyndall

Use this record

Citation

John Tyndall, Referee's report by John Tyndall, on a paper 'Introductory research on the induction of magnetism by electrical currents' by James Prescott Joule, 25 July 1855, RR/3/155, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_3_155/referees-report-by-john-tyndall-on-a-paper-introductory-research-on-the-induction-of-magnetism-by-electrical-currents-by-james-prescott-joule, accessed on 10 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_3_155/referees-report-by-john-tyndall-on-a-paper-introductory-research-on-the-induction-of-magnetism-by-electrical-currents-by-james-prescott-joule" title="Referee's report by John Tyndall, on a paper 'Introductory research on the induction of magnetism by electrical currents' by James Prescott Joule" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection