Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Charles Thomson Rees Wilson, on a paper 'Experiments on the diffraction of cathode rays.—II' by George Paget Thomson

Reference number: RR/38/152

Date: May 1928

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1928].

Endorsed on verso as received 22 May 1928.

Reference number
RR/38/152
Earliest possible date
May 1928
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Charles Thomson Rees Wilson

View page for Charles Thomson Rees Wilson

Use this record

Citation

Charles Thomson Rees Wilson, Referee's report by Charles Thomson Rees Wilson, on a paper 'Experiments on the diffraction of cathode rays.—II' by George Paget Thomson, May 1928, RR/38/152, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_38_152/referees-report-by-charles-thomson-rees-wilson-on-a-paper-experiments-on-the-diffraction-of-cathode-raysii-by-george-paget-thomson, accessed on 23 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_38_152/referees-report-by-charles-thomson-rees-wilson-on-a-paper-experiments-on-the-diffraction-of-cathode-raysii-by-george-paget-thomson" title="Referee's report by Charles Thomson Rees Wilson, on a paper 'Experiments on the diffraction of cathode rays.—II' by George Paget Thomson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection