Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

The experimental part of the paper is recommended for publication but the theoretical part is not recommended. It should be sent to a mathematical critic, such as Ralph Howard Fowler for an 'authoritative ruling'. Robert Robertson should also review the paper.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 8 August 1928.

Reference number
RR/37/9
Earliest possible date
August 1926
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Thomas Martin Lowry

View page for Thomas Martin Lowry

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Martin Lowry, Referee's report by Thomas Martin Lowry, on a paper 'The infrared emissionspectre of the carbon monoxide flame' by C R Bailey and Kim Hou Lih, August 1926, RR/37/9, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_37_9/referees-report-by-thomas-martin-lowry-on-a-paper-the-infrared-emissionspectre-of-the-carbon-monoxide-flame-by-c-r-bailey-and-kim-hou-lih, accessed on 13 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_37_9/referees-report-by-thomas-martin-lowry-on-a-paper-the-infrared-emissionspectre-of-the-carbon-monoxide-flame-by-c-r-bailey-and-kim-hou-lih" title="Referee's report by Thomas Martin Lowry, on a paper 'The infrared emissionspectre of the carbon monoxide flame' by C R Bailey and Kim Hou Lih" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection