Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Refers to work of Fischer and Weijat.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1927]

Endorsed on verso as received 5 May 1927.

Reference number
RR/36/67
Earliest possible date
May 1927
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Harden

View page for Arthur Harden

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Harden, Referee's report by Arthur Harden, on a paper 'The isolation of some hitherto undescribed products of hydrolysis of proteins. — Part IV' by Samuel Barnett Schryver and H W Buston, May 1927, RR/36/67, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_36_67/referees-report-by-arthur-harden-on-a-paper-the-isolation-of-some-hitherto-undescribed-products-of-hydrolysis-of-proteins-part-iv-by-samuel-barnett-schryver-and-h-w-buston, accessed on 16 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_36_67/referees-report-by-arthur-harden-on-a-paper-the-isolation-of-some-hitherto-undescribed-products-of-hydrolysis-of-proteins-part-iv-by-samuel-barnett-schryver-and-h-w-buston" title="Referee's report by Arthur Harden, on a paper 'The isolation of some hitherto undescribed products of hydrolysis of proteins. — Part IV' by Samuel Barnett Schryver and H W Buston" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection