Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Botany

Referee has not filled out the form - it is unknown whether the paper is recommended or not.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1928].

Endorsed on verso as received 15 June 1927.

Reference number
RR/35/89
Earliest possible date
June 1927
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Harold William Taylor Wager

View page for Harold William Taylor Wager

Use this record

Citation

Harold William Taylor Wager, Referee's report by Harold William Taylor Wager, on a paper 'The differential effect of the ions of three-salt solutions on the growth of potato plants sand culture' by F G Gregory, June 1927, RR/35/89, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_35_89/referees-report-by-harold-william-taylor-wager-on-a-paper-the-differential-effect-of-the-ions-of-three-salt-solutions-on-the-growth-of-potato-plants-sand-culture-by-f-g-gregory, accessed on 10 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_35_89/referees-report-by-harold-william-taylor-wager-on-a-paper-the-differential-effect-of-the-ions-of-three-salt-solutions-on-the-growth-of-potato-plants-sand-culture-by-f-g-gregory" title="Referee's report by Harold William Taylor Wager, on a paper 'The differential effect of the ions of three-salt solutions on the growth of potato plants sand culture' by F G Gregory" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection