Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Engineering sciences

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. The paper provides a 'distinct advance in our knowledge of corrosion'.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1927].

Endorsed on verso as received 18 July 1927.

Reference number
RR/35/16
Earliest possible date
July 1927
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frank Edward Smith

View page for Frank Edward Smith

Use this record

Citation

Frank Edward Smith, Referee's report by Frank Edward Smith, on a paper 'The theory of metallic corrosion in the light of quantitative measurements' by Guy Dunstan Bengough, J M Stuart and A R Lee, July 1927, RR/35/16, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_35_16/referees-report-by-frank-edward-smith-on-a-paper-the-theory-of-metallic-corrosion-in-the-light-of-quantitative-measurements-by-guy-dunstan-bengough-j-m-stuart-and-a-r-lee, accessed on 16 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_35_16/referees-report-by-frank-edward-smith-on-a-paper-the-theory-of-metallic-corrosion-in-the-light-of-quantitative-measurements-by-guy-dunstan-bengough-j-m-stuart-and-a-r-lee" title="Referee's report by Frank Edward Smith, on a paper 'The theory of metallic corrosion in the light of quantitative measurements' by Guy Dunstan Bengough, J M Stuart and A R Lee" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection