Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests a few modifications to the method and description, but otherwise no modifications are necessary.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1926]

Endorsed on verso as received 10 March 1926.

Reference number
RR/34/51
Earliest possible date
08 March 1926
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Richard Tetley Glazebrook

View page for Richard Tetley Glazebrook

Use this record

Citation

Richard Tetley Glazebrook, Referee's report by Richard Tetley Glazebrook, on a paper 'Some thermal constants of solid and liquid carbon dioxide' by Otto Maass and W H Barnes, 08 March 1926, RR/34/51, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_34_51/referees-report-by-richard-tetley-glazebrook-on-a-paper-some-thermal-constants-of-solid-and-liquid-carbon-dioxide-by-otto-maass-and-w-h-barnes, accessed on 12 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_34_51/referees-report-by-richard-tetley-glazebrook-on-a-paper-some-thermal-constants-of-solid-and-liquid-carbon-dioxide-by-otto-maass-and-w-h-barnes" title="Referee's report by Richard Tetley Glazebrook, on a paper 'Some thermal constants of solid and liquid carbon dioxide' by Otto Maass and W H Barnes" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection