Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

Does not state whether the paper is recommended for publication. Instead, offers a list of criticisms that the author should read.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1926].

Endorsed on verso as received 12 April 1926.

Reference number
RR/33/86
Earliest possible date
02 April 1926
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Geoffrey Ingram Taylor

View page for Geoffrey Ingram Taylor

Use this record

Citation

Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, Referee's report by Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, on a paper 'The properties of torsional vibrations reciprocating engine shafts. Part I' by George Ridsdale Goldsbrough, 02 April 1926, RR/33/86, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_33_86/referees-report-by-geoffrey-ingram-taylor-on-a-paper-the-properties-of-torsional-vibrations-reciprocating-engine-shafts-part-i-by-george-ridsdale-goldsbrough, accessed on 23 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_33_86/referees-report-by-geoffrey-ingram-taylor-on-a-paper-the-properties-of-torsional-vibrations-reciprocating-engine-shafts-part-i-by-george-ridsdale-goldsbrough" title="Referee's report by Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, on a paper 'The properties of torsional vibrations reciprocating engine shafts. Part I' by George Ridsdale Goldsbrough" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection