Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, although the referee is unsure what to make of the paper. The experimental part of the paper is 'certainly good and worth publishing' but the theoretical part is 'very thin'.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1926].

Endorsed on verso as received 31 March 1926.

Reference number
RR/33/11
Earliest possible date
March 1926
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Harold Jeffreys

View page for Harold Jeffreys

Use this record

Citation

Harold Jeffreys, Referee's report by Harold Jeffreys, on a paper 'Primary and secondary vortices in oscillating fluids: their connection with skin friction' by (the late) H Ayrton, March 1926, RR/33/11, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_33_11/referees-report-by-harold-jeffreys-on-a-paper-primary-and-secondary-vortices-in-oscillating-fluids-their-connection-with-skin-friction-by-the-late-h-ayrton, accessed on 22 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_33_11/referees-report-by-harold-jeffreys-on-a-paper-primary-and-secondary-vortices-in-oscillating-fluids-their-connection-with-skin-friction-by-the-late-h-ayrton" title="Referee's report by Harold Jeffreys, on a paper 'Primary and secondary vortices in oscillating fluids: their connection with skin friction' by (the late) H Ayrton" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection