Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full. No modifications are needed, as the paper is 'clearly and succinctly written'.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1925].

Endorsed on verso as received 4 June 1925.

Reference number
RR/32/12
Earliest possible date
June 1925
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Robert Muir

View page for Robert Muir

Use this record

Citation

Robert Muir, Referee's report by Robert Muir, on a paper 'Studies on the nature of the immunity reaction. Part I - An experimental study of pneumococcal immunity' by Richard R Armstrong, June 1925, RR/32/12, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_32_12/referees-report-by-robert-muir-on-a-paper-studies-on-the-nature-of-the-immunity-reaction-part-i-an-experimental-study-of-pneumococcal-immunity-by-richard-r-armstrong, accessed on 10 November 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_32_12/referees-report-by-robert-muir-on-a-paper-studies-on-the-nature-of-the-immunity-reaction-part-i-an-experimental-study-of-pneumococcal-immunity-by-richard-r-armstrong" title="Referee's report by Robert Muir, on a paper 'Studies on the nature of the immunity reaction. Part I - An experimental study of pneumococcal immunity' by Richard R Armstrong" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection