Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

Does not write review - asks reader to refer to his other review of part II of the paper (RR/32/15)

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1925].

Endorsed on verso as received 30 April 1925.

Reference number
RR/32/10
Earliest possible date
April 1925
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Bulloch

View page for William Bulloch

Use this record

Citation

William Bulloch, Referee's report by William Bulloch, on a paper 'Studies on the nature of the immunity reaction. Part I - An experimental study of pneumococcal immunity' by Richard R Armstrong, April 1925, RR/32/10, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_32_10/referees-report-by-william-bulloch-on-a-paper-studies-on-the-nature-of-the-immunity-reaction-part-i-an-experimental-study-of-pneumococcal-immunity-by-richard-r-armstrong, accessed on 14 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_32_10/referees-report-by-william-bulloch-on-a-paper-studies-on-the-nature-of-the-immunity-reaction-part-i-an-experimental-study-of-pneumococcal-immunity-by-richard-r-armstrong" title="Referee's report by William Bulloch, on a paper 'Studies on the nature of the immunity reaction. Part I - An experimental study of pneumococcal immunity' by Richard R Armstrong" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection