Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1925]

Endorsed on verso as received 14 October 1924.

Reference number
RR/31/65
Earliest possible date
October 1924
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Robertson Cushny

View page for Arthur Robertson Cushny

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Robertson Cushny, Referee's report by Arthur Robertson Cushny, on a paper 'The secretion of urine as studied on the isolated kidney' by Ernest Henry Starling and Ernest Basil Verney, October 1924, RR/31/65, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_31_65/referees-report-by-arthur-robertson-cushny-on-a-paper-the-secretion-of-urine-as-studied-on-the-isolated-kidney-by-ernest-henry-starling-and-ernest-basil-verney, accessed on 19 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_31_65/referees-report-by-arthur-robertson-cushny-on-a-paper-the-secretion-of-urine-as-studied-on-the-isolated-kidney-by-ernest-henry-starling-and-ernest-basil-verney" title="Referee's report by Arthur Robertson Cushny, on a paper 'The secretion of urine as studied on the isolated kidney' by Ernest Henry Starling and Ernest Basil Verney" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection