Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Considers the paper incomplete, and should not be read before the Royal Society. The illustrations are unsuitable in character.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1924]

Endorsed on verso as received 22 January 1924.

Reference number
RR/31/53
Earliest possible date
January 1924
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Bretland Farmer

View page for John Bretland Farmer

Use this record

Citation

John Bretland Farmer, Referee's report by John Bretland Farmer, on a paper 'Observations on the formation of bi-nuclear cells' by [Thomas Strangeways Pigg] Strangeways, January 1924, RR/31/53, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_31_53/referees-report-by-john-bretland-farmer-on-a-paper-observations-on-the-formation-of-bi-nuclear-cells-by-thomas-strangeways-pigg-strangeways, accessed on 13 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_31_53/referees-report-by-john-bretland-farmer-on-a-paper-observations-on-the-formation-of-bi-nuclear-cells-by-thomas-strangeways-pigg-strangeways" title="Referee's report by John Bretland Farmer, on a paper 'Observations on the formation of bi-nuclear cells' by [Thomas Strangeways Pigg] Strangeways" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection