Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Considers the printing cost for lithographs too high, suggests the author re-draw the illustrations for block printing.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1924]

Endorsed on verso as received 28 January 1924.

Reference number
RR/31/52
Earliest possible date
26 January 1924
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Edwin Boycott

View page for Arthur Edwin Boycott

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Edwin Boycott, Referee's report by Arthur Edwin Boycott, on a paper 'Observations on the formation of bi-nuclear cells' by [Thomas Strangeways Pigg] Strangeways, 26 January 1924, RR/31/52, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_31_52/referees-report-by-arthur-edwin-boycott-on-a-paper-observations-on-the-formation-of-bi-nuclear-cells-by-thomas-strangeways-pigg-strangeways, accessed on 20 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_31_52/referees-report-by-arthur-edwin-boycott-on-a-paper-observations-on-the-formation-of-bi-nuclear-cells-by-thomas-strangeways-pigg-strangeways" title="Referee's report by Arthur Edwin Boycott, on a paper 'Observations on the formation of bi-nuclear cells' by [Thomas Strangeways Pigg] Strangeways" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection