Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Assumes the calculations are correct, has been unable to verify owing to being unfamiliar with the equations.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1925]

Endorsed on verso as received 5 November 1924.

Reference number
RR/31/14
Earliest possible date
November 1924
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Owen Willans Richardson

View page for Owen Willans Richardson

Use this record

Citation

Owen Willans Richardson, Referee's report by Owen Willans Richardson, on a paper 'The interpretation of the results of Bucherer's experiments on e/m' by Thomas Lewis, November 1924, RR/31/14, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_31_14/referees-report-by-owen-willans-richardson-on-a-paper-the-interpretation-of-the-results-of-bucherers-experiments-on-em-by-thomas-lewis, accessed on 19 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_31_14/referees-report-by-owen-willans-richardson-on-a-paper-the-interpretation-of-the-results-of-bucherers-experiments-on-em-by-thomas-lewis" title="Referee's report by Owen Willans Richardson, on a paper 'The interpretation of the results of Bucherer's experiments on e/m' by Thomas Lewis" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection