Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Engineering Sciences

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The paper covers only technical aspects of the problem. The experimental method is interesting, but not novel. 'Taking the above together, it appears that publication by the [Royal Society] would confer on a decidedly mediocre paper an altogether undue degree of importance].

[Not published]

Endorsed on verso as received 18 June 1924.

Reference number
RR/31/13
Earliest possible date
June 1924
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Walter Rosenhain

View page for Walter Rosenhain

Use this record

Citation

Walter Rosenhain, Referee's report by Walter Rosenhain, on a paper 'The failure of sprial steel spring under repetition stresses' by F C Lea and J D Vaughan, June 1924, RR/31/13, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_31_13/referees-report-by-walter-rosenhain-on-a-paper-the-failure-of-sprial-steel-spring-under-repetition-stresses-by-f-c-lea-and-j-d-vaughan, accessed on 10 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_31_13/referees-report-by-walter-rosenhain-on-a-paper-the-failure-of-sprial-steel-spring-under-repetition-stresses-by-f-c-lea-and-j-d-vaughan" title="Referee's report by Walter Rosenhain, on a paper 'The failure of sprial steel spring under repetition stresses' by F C Lea and J D Vaughan" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection