Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. In discussion with Ernest Henry Starling, some abbreviations have been made.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1925]

Endorsed on verso as received 26 November 1924.

Reference number
RR/30/5
Earliest possible date
25 November 1924
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Renton Elliott

View page for Thomas Renton Elliott

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Renton Elliott, Referee's report by Thomas Renton Elliott, on a paper 'Central and reflex regulation of the circulation' by Gleb von Anrep and Ernest Henry Starling, 25 November 1924, RR/30/5, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_30_5/referees-report-by-thomas-renton-elliott-on-a-paper-central-and-reflex-regulation-of-the-circulation-by-gleb-von-anrep-and-ernest-henry-starling, accessed on 18 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_30_5/referees-report-by-thomas-renton-elliott-on-a-paper-central-and-reflex-regulation-of-the-circulation-by-gleb-von-anrep-and-ernest-henry-starling" title="Referee's report by Thomas Renton Elliott, on a paper 'Central and reflex regulation of the circulation' by Gleb von Anrep and Ernest Henry Starling" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection