Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The paper is too long for the Proceedings. The statistical measurements are based on limited numbers, and suggests the paper be postponed until this has been rectified. Suggests a bacteriologist should continue the experiments.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 1925]

Endorsed on verso as received 26 February 1924.

Reference number
RR/30/26
Earliest possible date
25 February 1924
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
9 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

George Udny Yule

View page for George Udny Yule

Use this record

Citation

George Udny Yule, Referee's report by George Udny Yule, on a paper 'On the physics of incubation' by Arthur Prince Chattock, 25 February 1924, RR/30/26, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_30_26/referees-report-by-george-udny-yule-on-a-paper-on-the-physics-of-incubation-by-arthur-prince-chattock, accessed on 29 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_30_26/referees-report-by-george-udny-yule-on-a-paper-on-the-physics-of-incubation-by-arthur-prince-chattock" title="Referee's report by George Udny Yule, on a paper 'On the physics of incubation' by Arthur Prince Chattock" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection