Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. 'Mr Henfrey's sketches are exquisitely done and very instrcutive'. Suggests extending the anatomical examination to cover more parts of the plant. Refers to work of Gottfried Reinhold Treviranus.

Subject: Botany

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Reference number
RR/2/99
Earliest possible date
05 May 1852
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Nathaniel Wallich

View page for Nathaniel Wallich

Use this record

Citation

Nathaniel Wallich, Referee's report by Nathaniel Wallich, on a paper 'On the anatomy of the stem of Victoria regia' by Arthur Henfrey, 05 May 1852, RR/2/99, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_2_99/referees-report-by-nathaniel-wallich-on-a-paper-on-the-anatomy-of-the-stem-of-victoria-regia-by-arthur-henfrey, accessed on 24 April 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_2_99/referees-report-by-nathaniel-wallich-on-a-paper-on-the-anatomy-of-the-stem-of-victoria-regia-by-arthur-henfrey" title="Referee's report by Nathaniel Wallich, on a paper 'On the anatomy of the stem of Victoria regia' by Arthur Henfrey" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection