Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests that the author be asked if an abstract in the Proceedings would be sufficient until such a times their researches are fuller and more complete for publication in the Transactions. Discusses the merits and otherwise of the reviewing process and the tasks of the referee.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Reference number
RR/2/226
Earliest possible date
26 April 1855
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

James Joseph Sylvester

View page for James Joseph Sylvester

Use this record

Citation

James Joseph Sylvester, Referee's report by James Joseph Sylvester, on a paper 'Researches on the theory of invariants' by William Spottiswoode, 26 April 1855, RR/2/226, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_2_226/referees-report-by-james-joseph-sylvester-on-a-paper-researches-on-the-theory-of-invariants-by-william-spottiswoode, accessed on 20 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_2_226/referees-report-by-james-joseph-sylvester-on-a-paper-researches-on-the-theory-of-invariants-by-william-spottiswoode" title="Referee's report by James Joseph Sylvester, on a paper 'Researches on the theory of invariants' by William Spottiswoode" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection