Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Thinks paper has omitted some important information. Refers to recently published paper by John Lubbock on a similar subject.

Subject: Zoology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Reference number
RR/2/142
Earliest possible date
26 May 1853
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Newport

View page for George Newport

Use this record

Citation

George Newport, Referee's report by George Newport, on a paper 'On the anatomy of Nautilus umbilicatus, compared with that of Nautilus pompilius' by John Denis MacDonald, 26 May 1853, RR/2/142, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_2_142/referees-report-by-george-newport-on-a-paper-on-the-anatomy-of-nautilus-umbilicatus-compared-with-that-of-nautilus-pompilius-by-john-denis-macdonald, accessed on 16 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_2_142/referees-report-by-george-newport-on-a-paper-on-the-anatomy-of-nautilus-umbilicatus-compared-with-that-of-nautilus-pompilius-by-john-denis-macdonald" title="Referee's report by George Newport, on a paper 'On the anatomy of Nautilus umbilicatus, compared with that of Nautilus pompilius' by John Denis MacDonald" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection