Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The illustrative plate is the most important part of the paper. The intention of the paper is 'by no means fulfilled'. The nature of the nerves of the heart have been satisfactorily examined by Carl Friedrich Wilhelm Ludwig, Georg Friedrich Karl Heinrich von Bidder, Rudolf Wagner, Albert von Kölliker, etc.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Reference number
RR/2/134
Earliest possible date
07 April 1854
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Busk

View page for George Busk

Use this record

Citation

George Busk, Referee's report by George Busk, on a paper 'On the nerves which supply the muscular structure of the heart' by Robert Lee, 07 April 1854, RR/2/134, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_2_134/referees-report-by-george-busk-on-a-paper-on-the-nerves-which-supply-the-muscular-structure-of-the-heart-by-robert-lee, accessed on 15 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_2_134/referees-report-by-george-busk-on-a-paper-on-the-nerves-which-supply-the-muscular-structure-of-the-heart-by-robert-lee" title="Referee's report by George Busk, on a paper 'On the nerves which supply the muscular structure of the heart' by Robert Lee" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection