Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by George Biddell Airy, on a paper 'On the secular variation of the moon's mean motion' by John Couch Adams

Reference number: RR/2/1

Date: 23 June 1853

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society' unless Council communicate with the author requesting a more detailed investigation.

Subject: Astronomy

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Reference number
RR/2/1
Earliest possible date
23 June 1853
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Biddell Airy

View page for George Biddell Airy

Use this record

Citation

George Biddell Airy, Referee's report by George Biddell Airy, on a paper 'On the secular variation of the moon's mean motion' by John Couch Adams, 23 June 1853, RR/2/1, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_2_1/referees-report-by-george-biddell-airy-on-a-paper-on-the-secular-variation-of-the-moons-mean-motion-by-john-couch-adams, accessed on 22 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_2_1/referees-report-by-george-biddell-airy-on-a-paper-on-the-secular-variation-of-the-moons-mean-motion-by-john-couch-adams" title="Referee's report by George Biddell Airy, on a paper 'On the secular variation of the moon's mean motion' by John Couch Adams" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection