Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, as 'the essential facts have already been published elsewhere'.

[Not published].

Endorsed on verso as received 2 January 1924.

Reference number
RR/29/38
Earliest possible date
01 January 1924
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edgar Johnson Allen

View page for Edgar Johnson Allen

Use this record

Citation

Edgar Johnson Allen, Referee's report by Edgar Johnson Allen, on a paper 'On the necessity for quantitative methods in the investigation of the animal life on the sea bottom' by C F J Petersen, 01 January 1924, RR/29/38, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_29_38/referees-report-by-edgar-johnson-allen-on-a-paper-on-the-necessity-for-quantitative-methods-in-the-investigation-of-the-animal-life-on-the-sea-bottom-by-c-f-j-petersen, accessed on 06 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_29_38/referees-report-by-edgar-johnson-allen-on-a-paper-on-the-necessity-for-quantitative-methods-in-the-investigation-of-the-animal-life-on-the-sea-bottom-by-c-f-j-petersen" title="Referee's report by Edgar Johnson Allen, on a paper 'On the necessity for quantitative methods in the investigation of the animal life on the sea bottom' by C F J Petersen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection