Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Considers the paper to be 'borderline'. The discussions are more slight than would be expected for a Philosophical Transactions paper.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1923]

Endorsed on verso as received 19 April 1923.

Reference number
RR/28/91
Earliest possible date
April 1923
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Lewis

View page for Thomas Lewis

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Lewis, Referee's report by Thomas Lewis, on a paper 'The influence of mechanical conditions of the circulation on the electrocardiogram' by Ivan de Burgh Daly, April 1923, RR/28/91, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_28_91/referees-report-by-thomas-lewis-on-a-paper-the-influence-of-mechanical-conditions-of-the-circulation-on-the-electrocardiogram-by-ivan-de-burgh-daly, accessed on 10 November 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_28_91/referees-report-by-thomas-lewis-on-a-paper-the-influence-of-mechanical-conditions-of-the-circulation-on-the-electrocardiogram-by-ivan-de-burgh-daly" title="Referee's report by Thomas Lewis, on a paper 'The influence of mechanical conditions of the circulation on the electrocardiogram' by Ivan de Burgh Daly" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection