Referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'On the depth of earthquake foci' by Sudhansu Kumar Banerji
Reference number: RR/28/61
Date: May 1923
Description
Sectional Committee: Mathematics
Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The argument is interesting and should be put on record, 'but needs reconsideration'.
[Not published]
Endorsed on verso as received 23 May 1923.
- Reference number
- RR/28/61
- Earliest possible date
- May 1923
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type D)
- Page extent
- 4 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Horace Lamb, Referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'On the depth of earthquake foci' by Sudhansu Kumar Banerji, May 1923, RR/28/61, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_28_61/referees-report-by-horace-lamb-on-a-paper-on-the-depth-of-earthquake-foci-by-sudhansu-kumar-banerji, accessed on 05 October 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_28_61/referees-report-by-horace-lamb-on-a-paper-on-the-depth-of-earthquake-foci-by-sudhansu-kumar-banerji
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_28_61/referees-report-by-horace-lamb-on-a-paper-on-the-depth-of-earthquake-foci-by-sudhansu-kumar-banerji" title="Referee's report by Horace Lamb, on a paper 'On the depth of earthquake foci' by Sudhansu Kumar Banerji" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 28, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1922-1923 Reference number: RR/28
Related Fellows
-
Horace Lamb
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection