Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The paper is a supplement to an earlier work by the same authors. Refers to work of Arthur Berry and Lorna M Swain.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 19923]

Endorsed on verso as received 11 May 1923.

Reference number
RR/28/59
Earliest possible date
May 1923
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Henry Havelock

View page for Thomas Henry Havelock

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Henry Havelock, Referee's report by Thomas Henry Havelock, on a paper 'The resistance of a cylinder moving in a viscous fluid' by Leonard Bairstow, B M Cave and E D Lang, May 1923, RR/28/59, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_28_59/referees-report-by-thomas-henry-havelock-on-a-paper-the-resistance-of-a-cylinder-moving-in-a-viscous-fluid-by-leonard-bairstow-b-m-cave-and-e-d-lang, accessed on 25 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_28_59/referees-report-by-thomas-henry-havelock-on-a-paper-the-resistance-of-a-cylinder-moving-in-a-viscous-fluid-by-leonard-bairstow-b-m-cave-and-e-d-lang" title="Referee's report by Thomas Henry Havelock, on a paper 'The resistance of a cylinder moving in a viscous fluid' by Leonard Bairstow, B M Cave and E D Lang" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection