Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Refers to work of Thomson [William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin?]. Suggests reducing the number of illustrations.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1923]

Endorsed on verso as received 4 September 1923.

Reference number
RR/28/110
Earliest possible date
03 September 1923
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Ernest George Coker

View page for Ernest George Coker

Use this record

Citation

Ernest George Coker, Referee's report by Ernest George Coker, on a paper 'The behaviour of metals subjected to repeated stresses' by Herbert John Gough and D Hanson, 03 September 1923, RR/28/110, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_28_110/referees-report-by-ernest-george-coker-on-a-paper-the-behaviour-of-metals-subjected-to-repeated-stresses-by-herbert-john-gough-and-d-hanson, accessed on 22 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_28_110/referees-report-by-ernest-george-coker-on-a-paper-the-behaviour-of-metals-subjected-to-repeated-stresses-by-herbert-john-gough-and-d-hanson" title="Referee's report by Ernest George Coker, on a paper 'The behaviour of metals subjected to repeated stresses' by Herbert John Gough and D Hanson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection