Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Frank Edward Smith, on a paper 'A method of analysing galvanometer records' by W Hartree and Archibald Vivian Hill

Reference number: RR/26/57

Date: 18 March 1921

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' A, 1921]

Endorsed on verso as received 21 March 1921.

Reference number
RR/26/57
Earliest possible date
18 March 1921
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frank Edward Smith

View page for Frank Edward Smith

Use this record

Citation

Frank Edward Smith, Referee's report by Frank Edward Smith, on a paper 'A method of analysing galvanometer records' by W Hartree and Archibald Vivian Hill, 18 March 1921, RR/26/57, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_26_57/referees-report-by-frank-edward-smith-on-a-paper-a-method-of-analysing-galvanometer-records-by-w-hartree-and-archibald-vivian-hill, accessed on 22 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_26_57/referees-report-by-frank-edward-smith-on-a-paper-a-method-of-analysing-galvanometer-records-by-w-hartree-and-archibald-vivian-hill" title="Referee's report by Frank Edward Smith, on a paper 'A method of analysing galvanometer records' by W Hartree and Archibald Vivian Hill" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection