Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

No clear statement regarding publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Suggests the paper requires shortening. Is unwilling to give criticism of the paper due to lack of knowledge, suggests a physiologist with better knowledge of the subject be asked to review.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London' B, 1922]

Endorsed on verso as received 11 June 1921.

Reference number
RR/26/50
Earliest possible date
10 June 1921
Physical description
Standardised form (type D) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Typescript
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Renton Elliott

View page for Thomas Renton Elliott

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Renton Elliott, Referee's report by Thomas Renton Elliott, on a paper 'The mechanism of ciliary movement' by James Gray, 10 June 1921, RR/26/50, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_26_50/referees-report-by-thomas-renton-elliott-on-a-paper-the-mechanism-of-ciliary-movement-by-james-gray, accessed on 03 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_26_50/referees-report-by-thomas-renton-elliott-on-a-paper-the-mechanism-of-ciliary-movement-by-james-gray" title="Referee's report by Thomas Renton Elliott, on a paper 'The mechanism of ciliary movement' by James Gray" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection