Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Geology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests reducing the size of some of the figures. The paper, although only dealing with a small group, has great bearing on the principles of evolution.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 1920]

Endorsed on verso as received 8 November 1917.

Reference number
RR/24/57
Earliest possible date
November 1917
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Henry Woods

View page for Henry Woods

Use this record

Citation

Henry Woods, Referee's report by Henry Woods, on a paper 'The pelmatoporinae, an essay on the evolution of a group of cretaceous polyzoa' by William Dickson Lang, November 1917, RR/24/57, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_24_57/referees-report-by-henry-woods-on-a-paper-the-pelmatoporinae-an-essay-on-the-evolution-of-a-group-of-cretaceous-polyzoa-by-william-dickson-lang, accessed on 16 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_24_57/referees-report-by-henry-woods-on-a-paper-the-pelmatoporinae-an-essay-on-the-evolution-of-a-group-of-cretaceous-polyzoa-by-william-dickson-lang" title="Referee's report by Henry Woods, on a paper 'The pelmatoporinae, an essay on the evolution of a group of cretaceous polyzoa' by William Dickson Lang" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection