Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, in full.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1918].

Endorsed on verso as received 11 July 1916.

Reference number
RR/23/14
Earliest possible date
July 1916
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Grafton Elliot Smith

View page for Grafton Elliot Smith

Use this record

Citation

Grafton Elliot Smith, Referee's report by Grafton Elliot Smith, on a paper 'The cytomorphosis of the marsupial enamel-organ and its significance in relation to the structure of the completed enamel' by J Thornton Carter, July 1916, RR/23/14, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_23_14/referees-report-by-grafton-elliot-smith-on-a-paper-the-cytomorphosis-of-the-marsupial-enamel-organ-and-its-significance-in-relation-to-the-structure-of-the-completed-enamel-by-j-thornton-carter, accessed on 05 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_23_14/referees-report-by-grafton-elliot-smith-on-a-paper-the-cytomorphosis-of-the-marsupial-enamel-organ-and-its-significance-in-relation-to-the-structure-of-the-completed-enamel-by-j-thornton-carter" title="Referee's report by Grafton Elliot Smith, on a paper 'The cytomorphosis of the marsupial enamel-organ and its significance in relation to the structure of the completed enamel' by J Thornton Carter" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection