Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The paper contains one fact, previously published, upon which numerous hypotheses are built, ad experiments conducted, 'which in many cases are fundamentally wrong'. Refers to work by Stock [?] and Kuss [?].

[Not published]

Endorsed on verso as received 2 June 1914.

Reference number
RR/21/151
Earliest possible date
June 1914
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Herbert Brereton Baker

View page for Herbert Brereton Baker

Use this record

Citation

Herbert Brereton Baker, Referee's report by Herbert Brereton Baker, on two papers 'Borohydrates.—Part II' and 'Borohydrates.—Part III' by Morris William Travers and others, June 1914, RR/21/151, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_21_151/referees-report-by-herbert-brereton-baker-on-two-papers-borohydratespart-ii-and-borohydratespart-iii-by-morris-william-travers-and-others, accessed on 21 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_21_151/referees-report-by-herbert-brereton-baker-on-two-papers-borohydratespart-ii-and-borohydratespart-iii-by-morris-william-travers-and-others" title="Referee's report by Herbert Brereton Baker, on two papers 'Borohydrates.—Part II' and 'Borohydrates.—Part III' by Morris William Travers and others" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection