Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1915]

Endorsed on verso as received 5 January 1915.

Reference number
RR/21/106
Earliest possible date
January 1915
Physical description
Standardised form (type D)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frederick Gowland Hopkins

View page for Frederick Gowland Hopkins

Use this record

Citation

Frederick Gowland Hopkins, Referee's report by Frederick Gowland Hopkins, on a paper 'The excitatory process in the dog's heart. Part II.- The ventricles' by Thomas Lewis and M A Rothschild, January 1915, RR/21/106, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_21_106/referees-report-by-frederick-gowland-hopkins-on-a-paper-the-excitatory-process-in-the-dogs-heart-part-ii-the-ventricles-by-thomas-lewis-and-m-a-rothschild, accessed on 11 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_21_106/referees-report-by-frederick-gowland-hopkins-on-a-paper-the-excitatory-process-in-the-dogs-heart-part-ii-the-ventricles-by-thomas-lewis-and-m-a-rothschild" title="Referee's report by Frederick Gowland Hopkins, on a paper 'The excitatory process in the dog's heart. Part II.- The ventricles' by Thomas Lewis and M A Rothschild" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection