Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The diagrams are necessary for understanding the text.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1914]

Endorsed on verso as received 1 August 1914.

Reference number
RR/21/105
Earliest possible date
August 1914
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Walter Holbrook Gaskell

View page for Walter Holbrook Gaskell

Use this record

Citation

Walter Holbrook Gaskell, Referee's report by Walter Holbrook Gaskell, on a paper 'The excitatory process in the dog’s heart. Part I. —The auricles' by Thomas Lewis, John Meakins and Paul D White, August 1914, RR/21/105, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_21_105/referees-report-by-walter-holbrook-gaskell-on-a-paper-the-excitatory-process-in-the-dogs-heart-part-i-the-auricles-by-thomas-lewis-john-meakins-and-paul-d-white, accessed on 06 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_21_105/referees-report-by-walter-holbrook-gaskell-on-a-paper-the-excitatory-process-in-the-dogs-heart-part-i-the-auricles-by-thomas-lewis-john-meakins-and-paul-d-white" title="Referee's report by Walter Holbrook Gaskell, on a paper 'The excitatory process in the dog’s heart. Part I. —The auricles' by Thomas Lewis, John Meakins and Paul D White" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection