Referee's report by Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, on a paper 'Neuro muscular structures in the heart' by A F S Kent
Reference number: RR/20/83
Date: August 1913
Description
Sectional committee: Physiology
Recommended for publication in Proceedings, in full.
[Not published].
Endorsed on verso as received 9 August 1913.
- Reference number
- RR/20/83
- Earliest possible date
- August 1913
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type C)
- Page extent
- 2 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, Referee's report by Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, on a paper 'Neuro muscular structures in the heart' by A F S Kent, August 1913, RR/20/83, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_20_83/referees-report-by-edward-albert-sharpey-schafer-on-a-paper-neuro-muscular-structures-in-the-heart-by-a-f-s-kent, accessed on 13 November 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_20_83/referees-report-by-edward-albert-sharpey-schafer-on-a-paper-neuro-muscular-structures-in-the-heart-by-a-f-s-kent
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_20_83/referees-report-by-edward-albert-sharpey-schafer-on-a-paper-neuro-muscular-structures-in-the-heart-by-a-f-s-kent" title="Referee's report by Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, on a paper 'Neuro muscular structures in the heart' by A F S Kent" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 20, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1913 Reference number: RR/20
Related Fellows
-
Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection