Referee's report by Hugh Longbourne Callendar, on a paper 'On negative adsorption' by A M Williams
Reference number: RR/20/157
Date: 20 November 1913

Description
Sectional committee: Physics and chemistry
Not recommended for publication in Proceedings, as it is 'very slight' and 'does not appear to make a distinct advance'.
[Not published].
Endorsed on verso as received 20 November 1913.
- Reference number
- RR/20/157
- Earliest possible date
- 20 November 1913
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type C)
- Page extent
- 2 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Hugh Longbourne Callendar, Referee's report by Hugh Longbourne Callendar, on a paper 'On negative adsorption' by A M Williams, 20 November 1913, RR/20/157, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_20_157/referees-report-by-hugh-longbourne-callendar-on-a-paper-on-negative-adsorption-by-a-m-williams, accessed on 09 February 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_20_157/referees-report-by-hugh-longbourne-callendar-on-a-paper-on-negative-adsorption-by-a-m-williams
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_20_157/referees-report-by-hugh-longbourne-callendar-on-a-paper-on-negative-adsorption-by-a-m-williams" title="Referee's report by Hugh Longbourne Callendar, on a paper 'On negative adsorption' by A M Williams" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 20, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1913 Reference number: RR/20
Related Fellows
-
Hugh Longbourne Callendar
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection