Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Geology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions, it is 'so important that it should be in full'. Referee regards it as a 'fundamental work'.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1914].

Endorsed on verso as received 11 July 1913.

Reference number
RR/20/128
Earliest possible date
July 1913
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Smith Woodward

View page for Arthur Smith Woodward

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Smith Woodward, Referee's report by Arthur Smith Woodward, on a paper 'A study of the skull of a dicynodon by means of serial sections' by Ignera Sollas and William Johnson Sollas, July 1913, RR/20/128, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_20_128/referees-report-by-arthur-smith-woodward-on-a-paper-a-study-of-the-skull-of-a-dicynodon-by-means-of-serial-sections-by-ignera-sollas-and-william-johnson-sollas, accessed on 10 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_20_128/referees-report-by-arthur-smith-woodward-on-a-paper-a-study-of-the-skull-of-a-dicynodon-by-means-of-serial-sections-by-ignera-sollas-and-william-johnson-sollas" title="Referee's report by Arthur Smith Woodward, on a paper 'A study of the skull of a dicynodon by means of serial sections' by Ignera Sollas and William Johnson Sollas" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection