Referees' reports: volume 20, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
Reference number: RR/20
Date: 1913
Description
Containing referee's reports arranged alphabetically by the lead author of the paper submitted to the Royal Society for review in 1913.
Notable referees and authors include Henry Edward Armstrong, Ernest Howard Griffiths and Thomas Henry Havelock.
When report is on a standard sheet (A), the questions are:
1. Whether the paper should or should not be published in the "Philosophical Transactions"
2. Whether, in the former case, it should be published in full or in part only, the part so to be published being indicated
3. Whether any modifications are necessary or desirable, and, if so, of what nature
4. Which illustrations (if any) accompanying the paper should be reproduced
General remarks
When report is on a standard sheet (C), the questions are:
1. Should the paper be published in the "Proceedings"?
2. If published, should it be printed as it stands, or with modifications?
3. Should all the illustrations be published?
4. If not published, should it be read before the Society?
General remarks
- Reference number
- RR/20
- Earliest possible date
- 1913
- Physical description
- Loose paper in folders
- Page extent
- One box comprising 164 papers
- Format
- Manuscript
Typescript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Referees' reports: volume 20, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication, 1913, RR/20, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_20/referees-reports-volume-20-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication, accessed on 16 September 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_20/referees-reports-volume-20-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_20/referees-reports-volume-20-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication" title="Referees' reports: volume 20, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This volume contains 164 manuscripts:
-
Referee's report by John Henry Poynting, on a paper 'A case of abnormal trichromatic colour vision due to a shift in the spectrum of the green-sensation curve' by William de Wiveleslie Abney and W Watson
July 1913 Creator: John Henry Poynting Reference number: RR/20/1 -
Referee's report by Herbert Brereton Baker, on a paper 'The thermal effects produced by heating and cooling palladium in hydrogen' by J H Andrew and A Holt
July 1913 Creator: Herbert Brereton Baker Reference number: RR/20/2 -
Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'On the fossil floras of the Wyre Forest, with special reference to the geology of the coalfield and its relationships to the neighbouring coal measure areas' by E A Newell Arber
17 July 1913 Creator: Dukinfield Henry Scott Reference number: RR/20/3 -
Referee's report by Aubrey Strahan, on a paper 'On the fossil floras of the Wyre Forest, with special reference to the geology of the coalfield and its relationships to the neighbouring coal measure areas' by E A Newell Arber
15 November 1913 Creator: Aubrey Strahan Reference number: RR/20/4
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1949
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection