Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by William Clift, on a paper 'On the male organs of some of the cartilaginous fishes' by John Davy

Reference number: RR/1/53

Date: 12 June 1839

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The paper is an 'acceptable contribution to this branch of anatomy at the present time', although the referee doesn't agree with the author's speculations on external functions.

Subject: Zoology

[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1839].

Reference number
RR/1/53
Earliest possible date
12 June 1839
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Clift

View page for William Clift

Use this record

Citation

William Clift, Referee's report by William Clift, on a paper 'On the male organs of some of the cartilaginous fishes' by John Davy, 12 June 1839, RR/1/53, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_1_53/referees-report-by-william-clift-on-a-paper-on-the-male-organs-of-some-of-the-cartilaginous-fishes-by-john-davy, accessed on 30 November 2023

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_1_53/referees-report-by-william-clift-on-a-paper-on-the-male-organs-of-some-of-the-cartilaginous-fishes-by-john-davy" title="Referee's report by William Clift, on a paper 'On the male organs of some of the cartilaginous fishes' by John Davy" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection