Referee's report by John Bostock, on an unnamed paper by George Newport
Reference number: RR/1/172
Date: 27 June 1837
Description
Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The conclusions are important but it is 'deceitfully long'. The referee recommends it being abridged.
- Reference number
- RR/1/172
- Earliest possible date
- 27 June 1837
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 2 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
John Bostock, Referee's report by John Bostock, on an unnamed paper by George Newport, 27 June 1837, RR/1/172, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_1_172/referees-report-by-john-bostock-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-george-newport, accessed on 15 June 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_1_172/referees-report-by-john-bostock-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-george-newport
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_1_172/referees-report-by-john-bostock-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-george-newport" title="Referee's report by John Bostock, on an unnamed paper by George Newport" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 1, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1832-1849 Reference number: RR/1
Related Fellows
-
John Bostock
Referee -
George Newport
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.
Dates: 1832 - 1954
View collection