Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Makes suggestions for illustrations to publish and omit, and suggests the author should give detailed calculations.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1914]

Endorsed on verso as received 27 December 1912.

Reference number
RR/19/19
Earliest possible date
December 1912
Physical description
Standardised form (type C)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Ernest Henry Starling

View page for Ernest Henry Starling

Use this record

Citation

Ernest Henry Starling, Referee's report by Ernest Henry Starling, on the Croonian Lecture 'A new conception of the glomerular function' by Thomas Gregor Brodie, December 1912, RR/19/19, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_19_19/referees-report-by-ernest-henry-starling-on-the-croonian-lecture-a-new-conception-of-the-glomerular-function-by-thomas-gregor-brodie, accessed on 14 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_19_19/referees-report-by-ernest-henry-starling-on-the-croonian-lecture-a-new-conception-of-the-glomerular-function-by-thomas-gregor-brodie" title="Referee's report by Ernest Henry Starling, on the Croonian Lecture 'A new conception of the glomerular function' by Thomas Gregor Brodie" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection