Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests the number of plates might be reduced, but if the paper is published this might not be advantageous. Is not sure if the Transactions is the most suitable place for the paper.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1914]

Endorsed on verso as received 11 October 1912.

Reference number
RR/19/136
Earliest possible date
October 1912
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Henry Lang

View page for William Henry Lang

Use this record

Citation

William Henry Lang, Referee's report by William Henry Lang, on a paper 'On the comparative anatomy and affinities of the Araucarineae' by Robert Boyd Thomson, October 1912, RR/19/136, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_19_136/referees-report-by-william-henry-lang-on-a-paper-on-the-comparative-anatomy-and-affinities-of-the-araucarineae-by-robert-boyd-thomson, accessed on 14 February 2026

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_19_136/referees-report-by-william-henry-lang-on-a-paper-on-the-comparative-anatomy-and-affinities-of-the-araucarineae-by-robert-boyd-thomson" title="Referee's report by William Henry Lang, on a paper 'On the comparative anatomy and affinities of the Araucarineae' by Robert Boyd Thomson" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection