Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests adding the magnification to the figures where this has been omitted. Refers to work by Hugh Miller. The paper provides new light on the development of Mesozoic plants.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1913]

Endorsed on verso as received 20 June 1912.

Reference number
RR/19/118
Earliest possible date
19 June 1912
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Dukinfield Henry Scott

View page for Dukinfield Henry Scott

Use this record

Citation

Dukinfield Henry Scott, Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'A petrified Williamsonia from Scotland' by Albert Charles Seward, 19 June 1912, RR/19/118, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_19_118/referees-report-by-dukinfield-henry-scott-on-a-paper-a-petrified-williamsonia-from-scotland-by-albert-charles-seward, accessed on 16 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_19_118/referees-report-by-dukinfield-henry-scott-on-a-paper-a-petrified-williamsonia-from-scotland-by-albert-charles-seward" title="Referee's report by Dukinfield Henry Scott, on a paper 'A petrified Williamsonia from Scotland' by Albert Charles Seward" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection