Referees' reports: volume 19, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
Reference number: RR/19
Date: 1912
Description
Containing referee's reports arranged alphabetically by the lead author of the paper submitted to the Royal Society for review in 1912.
Notable referees and authors include Charles Chree, Leonard Erskine Hill and Albert Charles Seward.
When report is on a standard sheet (A), the questions are:
1. Whether the paper should or should not be published in the "Philosophical Transactions"
2. Whether, in the former case, it should be published in full or in part only, the part so to be published being indicated
3. Whether any modifications are necessary or desirable, and, if so, of what nature
4. Which illustrations (if any) accompanying the paper should be reproduced
General remarks
When report is on a standard sheet (C), the questions are:
1. Should the paper be published in the "Proceedings"?
2. If published, should it be printed as it stands, or with modifications?
3. Should all the illustrations be published?
4. If not published, should it be read before the Society?
General remarks
- Reference number
- RR/19
- Earliest possible date
- 1912
- Physical description
- Loose paper in folders
- Page extent
- One box comprising 151 reports
- Format
- Typescript
Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Referees' reports: volume 19, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication, 1912, RR/19, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_19/referees-reports-volume-19-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication, accessed on 12 September 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_19/referees-reports-volume-19-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_19/referees-reports-volume-19-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication" title="Referees' reports: volume 19, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This volume contains 151 manuscripts:
-
Referee's report by Reginald Crundall Punnett, on a paper 'Transmission of environmental effects from parent to offspring in Simocephalus vetulus' by Wilfred Eade Agar
November 1912 Creator: Reginald Crundall Punnett Reference number: RR/19/1 -
Referee's report by Arthur Dendy, on a paper 'Transmission of environmental effects from parent to offspring in Simocephalus vetulus' by Wilfred Eade Agar
November 1912 Creator: Arthur Dendy Reference number: RR/19/2 -
Referee's report by William Bateson, on a paper 'Transmission of environmental effects from parent to offspring in Simocephalus vetulus' by Wilfred Eade Agar
20 November 1912 Creator: William Bateson Reference number: RR/19/3 -
Referee's report by Horace Tabberer Brown, on a paper 'Studies on enzyme action. XVI.—The enzymes of emulsin. (I) Prunase, the correlate of prunasin' by Henry Edward Armstrong, Edward Frankland Armstrong and Edward Horton
April 1912 Creator: Horace Tabberer Brown Reference number: RR/19/4
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1949
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection