Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on an unnamed paper by Ernest George Coker
Reference number: RR/18/119
Date: 27 December 1911
Description
Sectional committee unknown.
Recommended for publication in Proceedings, although the reference to Andrade should be revised.
[Not published].
Endorsed on verso as received 28 December 1911.
- Reference number
- RR/18/119
- Earliest possible date
- 27 December 1911
- Physical description
- Report on paper
- Page extent
- 1 page
- Format
- Typescript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Augustus Edward Hough Love, Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on an unnamed paper by Ernest George Coker, 27 December 1911, RR/18/119, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_18_119/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-ernest-george-coker, accessed on 12 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_18_119/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-ernest-george-coker
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_18_119/referees-report-by-augustus-edward-hough-love-on-an-unnamed-paper-by-ernest-george-coker" title="Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on an unnamed paper by Ernest George Coker" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 18, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1910-1911 Reference number: RR/18
Related Fellows
-
Augustus Edward Hough Love
Referee -
Ernest George Coker
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection