Referees' reports: volume 18, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
Reference number: RR/18
Date: 1910-1911
Description
Containing referee's reports arranged alphabetically by the lead author of the paper submitted to the Royal Society for review between 1910 and 1911.
Notable referees and authors include Hugh Longbourne Callendar, Edgar Philip Perman and Walter Noel Hartley.
When report is on a standard sheet (A), the questions are:
1. Whether the paper should or should not be published in the "Philosophical Transactions"
2. Whether, in the former case, it should be published in full or in part only, the part so to be published being indicated
3. Whether any modifications are necessary or desirable, and, if so, of what nature
4. Which illustrations (if any) accompanying the paper should be reproduced
General remarks
When report is on a standard sheet (C), the questions are:
1. Should the paper be published in the "Proceedings"?
2. If published, should it be printed as it stands, or with modifications?
3. Should all the illustrations be published?
4. If not published, should it be read before the Society?
General remarks
- Reference number
- RR/18
- Earliest possible date
- 1910-1911
- Physical description
- Loose paper in folders
- Page extent
- One box comprising 195 reports
- Format
- Typescript
Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Referees' reports: volume 18, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication, 1910-1911, RR/18, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_18/referees-reports-volume-18-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication, accessed on 21 April 2025
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_18/referees-reports-volume-18-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_18/referees-reports-volume-18-peer-reviews-of-scientific-papers-submitted-to-the-royal-society-for-publication" title="Referees' reports: volume 18, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This volume contains 194 manuscripts:
-
Referee's report by Charles Herbert Lees, on a paper 'On the viscous flow in metals and allied phenomena' by Edward Neville da Costa Andrade
February 1910 Creator: Charles Herbert Lees Reference number: RR/18/1 -
Referee's report by Augustus Edward Hough Love, on a paper 'The distribution of slide in a right six face subject to pure sheer' by Edward Neville da Costa Andrade
8 November 1910 Creator: Augustus Edward Hough Love Reference number: RR/18/2 -
Referee's report by Louis George Filon, on a paper 'The distribution of slide in a right six face subject to pure sheer' by Edward Neville da Costa Andrade
December 1910 Creator: Louis Napoleon George Filon Reference number: RR/18/3 -
Referee's report by Horace Tabbeler Brown, on a paper 'On the origins of osmotic effects III' by Henry Edward Armstrong and Edward Frankland Armstrong
01 May 1910 Creator: Horace Tabberer Brown Reference number: RR/18/4
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.
Dates: 1832 - 1954
View collection