Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

Endorsed on verso as received 14 June 1907.

Reference number
RR/17/8
Earliest possible date
June 1906
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Hugh Longbourne Callendar

View page for Hugh Longbourne Callendar

Use this record

Citation

Hugh Longbourne Callendar, Referee's report by Hugh Longbourne Callendar, on a paper 'On the osmotic pressures of some concentrated aqueous solutions' by Randal Thomas Mowbray Rawdon Berkeley and E G J Hartley, June 1906, RR/17/8, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_8/referees-report-by-hugh-longbourne-callendar-on-a-paper-on-the-osmotic-pressures-of-some-concentrated-aqueous-solutions-by-randal-thomas-mowbray-rawdon-berkeley-and-e-g-j-hartley, accessed on 28 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_8/referees-report-by-hugh-longbourne-callendar-on-a-paper-on-the-osmotic-pressures-of-some-concentrated-aqueous-solutions-by-randal-thomas-mowbray-rawdon-berkeley-and-e-g-j-hartley" title="Referee's report by Hugh Longbourne Callendar, on a paper 'On the osmotic pressures of some concentrated aqueous solutions' by Randal Thomas Mowbray Rawdon Berkeley and E G J Hartley" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection