Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Not recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Should be modified for publication. Is surprised there is no reference to previous work on the subject, especially the work of Harriette Chick ['A study of the process of nitrification with reference to the purification of sewage', DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1906.0015 Vol.77 1906]. The current paper is argumentative.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on verso as received 1 June 1906.

Reference number
RR/17/78
Earliest possible date
28 May 1906
Physical description
Standardised form (type C) and letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Henry Power

View page for William Henry Power

Use this record

Citation

William Henry Power, Referee's report by William Henry Power, on a paper 'Nitrification of sewage' by George Reid, 28 May 1906, RR/17/78, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_78/referees-report-by-william-henry-power-on-a-paper-nitrification-of-sewage-by-george-reid, accessed on 20 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_78/referees-report-by-william-henry-power-on-a-paper-nitrification-of-sewage-by-george-reid" title="Referee's report by William Henry Power, on a paper 'Nitrification of sewage' by George Reid" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection