Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics and Chemistry

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests a list of sections which should be omitted, and list of diagrams which should be included. Account is similar to author's previous accounts of eclipses in 1898 and 1900. Aspects of the expedition are given in too much detail, and already generally covered in the earlier accounts.

[Not published]

Endorsed on recto as received 16 July 1906.

Reference number
RR/17/58
Earliest possible date
July 1906
Physical description
Standardised form (type A)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frank Watson Dyson

View page for Frank Watson Dyson

Use this record

Citation

Frank Watson Dyson, Referee's report by Frank Watson Dyson, on a paper 'On the total solar eclipse, August 30, 1905' by Joseph Norman Lockyer, July 1906, RR/17/58, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_17_58/referees-report-by-frank-watson-dyson-on-a-paper-on-the-total-solar-eclipse-august-30-1905-by-joseph-norman-lockyer, accessed on 05 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_17_58/referees-report-by-frank-watson-dyson-on-a-paper-on-the-total-solar-eclipse-august-30-1905-by-joseph-norman-lockyer" title="Referee's report by Frank Watson Dyson, on a paper 'On the total solar eclipse, August 30, 1905' by Joseph Norman Lockyer" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection